INTRODUCTION

   Homegarden is smallholder farming system which combines trees with herb species and sometimes domestic animals around the homestead area. This system has wide socio-economic characteristics features with high species diversity (Pandey, Lata, Venkatesh, & Medhi, 2002; Pandey, Lata, Venkatesh, & Medhi, 2006; Udofia, Owoh, Ukpong, & Ekpo, 2012), provide crop productivity and avoidance of environment risks (Galhena, Freed, & Maredia, 2013; Shoo, 2009). Food production and other products such as; timber, feedstuff, spices, medicinal purpose plants, ornamentals etc. increased resource availability, improve productivity, control disease risk, yield over the year for household member and also serve as sources of genetic diversity (Amberber, Argaw, & Asfaw, 2014; Vibhuti, Karki, & Bargali, 2017).

   In India, many studies defined the role of homegardens in the human life of rural society, especially in terms of livelihood and economic significance (Das & Das, 2005; Gariya, Dwivedi, Kumar, & Tewari, 2016; Tangjang & Arunachalam, 2009). In the rural areas, farmers are mostly depend on their own homegarden product for livelihood. The effective integrated homegarden systems have a high potential to improve the crop productivity, maintain stable supply of socio-economic products (Kahiluoto, Smith, Moran, & Olesen, 2014; Karki, Bargali, & Bargali, 2021) and its contribution to household economic status in several ways (Bargali, Karki, Vibhuti, & Bargali, 2018; Tynsong & Tiwari, 2010). Integration of trees with crops also plays important role in enhancing the farm productivity and resilience of households through provision of diversified products for sustaining livelihoods (Bargali, Padalia, & Bargali, 2019; Lasco, Delfino, & Espaldon, 2014; Mbow, Smith, Skole, Duguma, & Bustamante, 2014).

   Traditional homegardens support multilayered species strata like; trees, shrubs and herbs near household (Kumar & Nair, 2004), which provide the edible food, fodder, fuelwood, ornamental and other products (Chandrashekara & Bajju, 2010; Vibhuti, Bargali, & Bargali, 2018). In addition, this system enhances the biodiversity, preserve the environmental and ecological benefits, nutritional security, soil conservation potential, mitigation of carbon dioxide emissions and job opportunity (Kumar & Tiwari, 2017; Padalia, Bargali, & Bargali, 2022; Vibhuti, Bargali, & Bargali, 2020). Ecological and socioeconomic factors including geographic area, weather, water accessibility, homegarden size, agricultural policy, market needs and household aspects are determining factors influencing the diversity and utilization of products obtained from the traditional homegardens (Bargali, 2016; Tesfaye & Desta, 2017).

   In Kumaun Himalaya, farmers maintain conventional homegardens for subsistence production and income generation (Parihaar, Bargali, & Bargali, 2014; Parihaar, Bargali, & Bargali, 2015). It has a multifaceted flora with occupant plant species and produced useful outputs due to high species diversity (Padalia, Bargali, & Bargali, 2015; Subba, Pala, Shukla, & Chakravarty, 2017). Cultivation of plant species in homestead homegardens differed from place to place depending on the socioeconomic conditions of the farmers (Mendez, Kok, & Somarriba, 2001). Therefore, a comparative study of different sized homegardens along an altitudinal gradient has been attempted in terms of species diversity, plant utilization pattern and their relative prevalence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area

   The study was conducted in Kumaun Himalaya in Uttarakhand State of India. The study sites were selected in Nainital district between 300-2000 m above mean sea level (29o19’-29o28’ N and 79o22’-79o38’ E). Four sites were selected along an altitudinal gradient viz., very low altitude (up to 350 m), low altitude (350-700 m), mid altitude (700-1500 m) and high altitude (above 2000 m) (Figure S1, Appendix A ). At each altitude, homegardens were categorized into three size classes viz., large (above 0.007 ha), medium (0.004-0.006 ha) and small homegardens (up to 0.003 ha) and three replicates for each size class at each altitude were selected. Climatically the study area falls within sub-tropical to temperate zones.

Sampling Method

   We have selected thirty-six homegardens from four altitudes (three homegardens of each size) on the basis of stratified random sampling. For phytosociology analysis, quadrat method was used and random quadrats of 10m × 10m size were laid for trees, 5m × 5m quadrat for shrubs and 1m × 1m quadrats for herbs in the selected sites (Curtis & Mcintosh, 1950). Plant species were identified with the help of vernacular name, flora, some relevant literatures and research papers (Gupta, 1968; Pande, Vibhuti, Awasthi, Bargali, & Bargali, 2016; Samant & Palni, 2000). Information regarding use of plants was collected through semi- structured questionnaire/interview from homegarden owners (Supplementary file 1, Appendix A ). Utilization of the plant species were categoried on the basis of their primary uses.

Family Importance Value (FIV Index)

   Family Importance Value (FIV) index is combination of richness, density and dominance. The FIV index was used to estimate the floristic composition at the species family level (Mori, Boom, Carvalino, & Santos, 1983).

Relative prevalence (RP)

   Relative prevalence (RP) of plant species was calculated following Zaman, Siddiquee, and Katoh (2010) as:

Relative prevalence (RP) = ni/A × fi/F

Where, ni = Number of specimen species i in homegarden, A = Area of homegarden, fi = Number of homegardens in which species i is present, F = Total number of homegardens.

Statistical Analysis

   Data and samples were collected from study sites. The data was complied with help Microsoft Excel and for statistical treatment using the STATISTICA and SPSS software to prove the statistical significance of the results obtained.

Figure 1

Average species richness in homegardens of Kumaun Himalaya.

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/14edbd7a-b635-42b6-89eb-7c6127a8e178/image/081c02e8-27e6-4928-ae97-62042be045e3-ufigure-1.png

RESULTS

Species composition and family importance value

A total number of 57 plant species belonging to 27 families were recorded. The homegardens of mid altitude (MA) supported maximum number of plant species (39) of which, medium sized homegardens (MHGs) shared 27 plant species followed by the large (25) and small (19) sized homegardens (LHGs, SHGs). At this altitude, 11 and 7 species present exclusively in MHGs and LHGs, respectively while 21 species were common in all sized homegardens (Figure 1). The high altitude homegardens (HA) supported lowest number of species (24 sp.) of which, LHGs contributed maximum (18 sp.) followed by MHGs (15 sp.) and SHGs (11 sp.). At this altitude, 1, 3 and 7 species were reported exclusively in SHGs, MHGs and LHGs, respectively while 13 species were common in all sized homegardens (Figure 1). The family importance value was recorded highest for family Amaryllidaceae (FIV=55.12). This family represented maximum number of species in all sized homegardens at all the altitudes followed by family Caryophyllaceae (FIV=27.71) in LHGs at low altitude (LA) and family Asteraceae (FIV =24.07) in LHGs at high altitude.

Table 1

Family Importance Value of homegarden species along the altitudinal gradient.

Altitudes

Family Importance Value

VLA

LA

MA

HA

HG sizes

SHGs

MHGs

LHGs

SHGs

MHGs

LHGs

SHGs

MHGs

LHGs

SHGs

MHGs

LHGs

Amaryllidaceae

44.10 (93)

46 (98)

45.14 (100)

48.36 (91)

52.98 (75)

55.12 (98)

53.43 (77)

26.78 (73)

41.47 (93)

50.07 (31)

30.13(27)

49.06 (59)

Amaranthaceae

-

-

10.08 (14)

8.35 (5)

7.33 (4)

-

-

5.83 (08)

-

-

-

-

Anacardiaceae

6.69 (01)

5.80 (01)

5.35 (01)

6.64 (01)

6.40 (02)

5.72 (01)

8.66 (03)

3.97 (01)

4.36 (01)

-

-

-

Apiaceae

12.69 (19)

-

-

-

-

-

-

6.89 (12)

-

12.68 (3)

33.71 (44)

-

Asteraceae

9.69 (10)

9.11 (11)

11.54 (19)

23.55 (28)

22.41 (21)

20.70 (22)

24.07 (24)

13.64 (23)

9.76 (16)

-

-

9.04 (6)

Annonaceae

-

5.62 (01)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Equisetaceae

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

4.96 (05)

-

-

-

Brassicaceae

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

8.73 (05)

6.88 (08)

-

-

23.19 (12)

Caricaceae

6.58 (01)

5.46 (01)

5.35 (01)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Caryophyllaceae

-

13.92 (24)

10.96 (17)

12.96 (17)

10.36 (09)

12.22 (15)

18.22 (22)

22.37 (70)

11.32 (20)

17.63 (18)

18.07 (18)

27.71 (39)

Cucurbitaceae

7.25 (03)

12.33 (05)

17.10 (06)

-

18.04 (04)

12.34 (04)

7.65 (01)

4.23 (02)

4.72 (02)

22.28 (04)

23.69 (06)

11.26 (02)

Euphorbiaceae

-

5.62 (01)

-

-

-

7.08 (04)

-

-

4.36 (01)

-

-

-

Ebenaceae

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.97 (01)

-

-

-

-

Fabaceae

27.30 (44)

12.84 (21)

5.35 (01)

33.49 (53)

-

-

9.67 (05)

6.62 (11)

11 (08)

20.36 (20)

17.93 (18)

-

Malvaceae

12.13 (17)

10.73 (15)

9.67 (13)

15.66 (08)

-

8.59 (08)

-

5.38 (06)

9.16 (14)

-

-

-

Myrtaceae

-

-

10.35 (01)

-

6.40 (02)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Oxalidaceae

8.41 (06)

10.73 (15)

11.17 (17)

12.96 (17)

18.77 (24)

10.79 (14)

11.53 (12)

8.30 (17)

9.56 (15)

29.93 (20)

15.89 (15)

18.50 (23)

Plantaginaceae

-

-

-

9.41 (08)

-

6.73 (04)

6.92 (11)

11.22 (28)

9.64 (16)

-

-

Poaceae

50.37 (95)

27.31 (47)

32.60 (64)

12.96 (17)

8.47 (06)

31.75 (35)

15.24 (16)

15.19 (29)

19.08 (19)

-

13.83 (12)

26.94 (19)

Rosaceae

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

7.94 (02)

-

11.14 (02)

15.18 (03)

14.97 (07)

Polygonaceae

-

-

-

-

8.85 (06)

8.14 (06)

-

5.87 (08)

8.48 (12

17.60 (20)

9.33 (04)

10.69 (09)

Rutaceae

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.97 (01)

8.72 (02)

-

-

-

Solanaceae

8.21 (05)

11.27 (17)

10.78 (64)

-

16.28 (10)

-

12.88 (11)

9.42 (21)

10.16 (06)

18.32 (08)

11.48 (08)

9.14 (06)

Sapindaceae

6.58 (01)

5.62 (01)

5.35 (01)

6.64 (01)

-

5.72 (01)

-

-

-

-

-

-

Tiliaceae

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

4.36 (01)

-

-

-

Violaceae

-

-

-

-

-

-

14.06 (14)

14.85 (42)

14.67 (30)

-

-

-

Zingiberaceae

-

17.62 (13)

9.21 (12)

9.01 (07)

23.71 (14)

14.16 (08)

10.69 (07)

5.83 (08)

12.32 (12)

-

10.76 (07)

-

[i] SHGs, MHGs, LHGs=small, medium, large homegardens,VLA, LA, MA, HA= very low, low, mid altitude, high altitude (individual numberof species in each family is given in parenthesis)

Figure 2

Plant utilization pattern of homegardens at very low(a), low (b), mid (c) and high

altitude (d).

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/14edbd7a-b635-42b6-89eb-7c6127a8e178/image/34b4af6f-af92-40f4-84de-85cc40ddff20-ufigure-2.png

Family Ebenaceae recorded lowest family importance value (FIV=3.97) in MHGs at mid altitude (Table 1).

Utilization pattern of homegardens species and their relative prevalence

There were six different utilization categories on the basis of primary important needs viz fruit, vegetable, spice, medicinal, fodder and other miscellaneous product (oil yielding, building purpose materials and religious values). Plants of medicinal and edible (vegetables) categories were the most frequent component followed by fodder, fruits, spices and miscellaneous categories in different sized homegardens (Figure 2). At very low altitude, medicinal plant contributed maximum in MHGs while vegetable was maximum in SHGs. At low altitude, contribution of medicine and vegetable was higher in MHGs. At mid and high altitudes, contribution of medicine was maximum in SHGs while vegetables contributed maximum in MHGs (Figure 2).

Figure 3

Plant part used in homegardens at different altitudes.

(SHGs,MHGs, LHGs=small, medium, large homegardens, VLA, LA, MA, HA= very low, low, mid,

high altitude)

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/14edbd7a-b635-42b6-89eb-7c6127a8e178/image/cf466e75-a162-4842-91e0-9af43e1c9bc9-ufigure-3.png

Fruit species cultivation was highest in LHGs at high altitude (22.22 %) whereas least fruit species cultivation (6.67) was recorded in SHGs at very low altitude. In an average percentage of plant species were used as spices, in which maximum contribution was recorded in SHGs at mid altitude (14.29 %) and minimum contribution was observed in LHGs at very low altitude (6.67 %). Among the different spice crops, C. sativum, C. longa and C. annuum were frequently cultivated species. Other miscellaneous plant species like C. dactylon, O. sanctum and M. indica were considered important religious plants and used in various rituals (Figure 2).

Relative prevalence provides the importance of individual species in a particular area. Among the cultivated herbs, A. cepa was the most prevalent species in SHGs at mid altitude (RP=4666) whereas A. esculentus, A. sativum, C. sativum and P. sativum showed least relative prevalence value in LHGs at mid altitude (Table 2). For wild herb species, relative prevalence was maximally shared by A. conyzoides in MHGs and minimum (RP=1800) by V. serpens (RP=277) in LHGs at mid attitude. For cultivated trees species, C. sinensis was most prevalent (RP=1200) in MHGs while C. limon and M. indica were the least prevalent species in LHGs at mid altitude (RP=277) (Table 2). Mid altitudes showed the most relative prevalence with a most utilizable species (Table 3). In the homestead homegarden, leaves were used in maximum by household member for own consumption followed by fruits,root, rhizomes, twig, stem, and seed at all the altitudes (Figure 3).

DISCUSSION

Status of homegardens plant species

According toSenanayake, Sangakkara, Pushpakumara, and Stamp (2009) species richness is influenced by homegarden size, managed by owners to fulfill their regular needs and for this they grow multipurpose plant species utilized for the different purposes.Yirefu, Adugna, and Behailu (2019) stated that utilization of homegarden product and their management can secure food productivity which determined by environmental factors and dietary habits as well as the socio-economic and market demands. In this study, the species richness showed significant positive correlation with homegarden size (Figure 4) at all the altitudes except mid altitude. In contrast, homegardens of Mexico (Rico-Gray, Garcia-Franco, Alexandra, Armando, & Paulino, 1990) and Indonesia (Abdoellah, Hadikusumah, Takeuchi, Okubo, & Parikesit, 2006) the numbers of species or individuals were not related to homegarden size. In the present study the mean species richness per homegarden ranged from 11 to 27.Martin, Geiger, Singhakumara, and Ashton (2019) estimates 64 species/garden in the Southwest region of Sri Lanka andKebebew (2018) observed 10 to 45 species in Arba Minch town, Southern Ethiopia. Across the homegarden sizes, species richness increased with increasing homegarden size except mid altitude homegardens where species richness was maximum in medium sized homegardens similar to the findings of Das et al. (2005). Family Importance Value indicated that across the altitudinal gradient, Amaryllidaceae was the most important family followed by Oxalidaceae (Table 1). These variabilities may be due to the changes in the procedure, plant life forms, topography and ecological factor.

Figure 4

Regression equation showing relationship between species richness and homegardensize at different altitudes.

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/14edbd7a-b635-42b6-89eb-7c6127a8e178/image/39070025-6348-4196-8978-7eaedad27b47-ufigure-4.png
Table 2

Relative prevalence of different plant species in homegardens across altitudinal gradient.

Plant species

VLA

LA

MA

HA

SHGs

MHGs

LHG

SHGs

MHGs

LHG

SHGs

MHGs

LHG

SHGs

MHGs

LHG

Cultivated herb species

Abelmoschus esculentus (Linn.) Moench

1185

1056

833

-

-

527.77

-

600

277.77

-

-

-

Allium stracyes Linn.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

285.71

Allium cepa Linn.

1778

1056

833

1185.18

1266.67

791.66

4666.67

1800

555.55

1222

833.33

571.43

Allium sativum Linn.

1185

704

556

592.59

844.44

1555.56

1200

277.77

1833.33

833.33

571.43

Amaranthus blitum var. oleracea Hook.

-

-

278

592.59

-

-

-

600

-

-

-

-

Brassica juncea (Linn.)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

600

-

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis Linn.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

600

Brassica oleracea var. capitata Linn.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

600

277.77

-

-

571.43

Capsicum annuum Linn.

-

704

556

-

422.22

3111.11

-

833.33

1833.33

833.33

571.43

Colocasia esculenta Schott

-

352

278

-

422.22

527.77

1555.56

-

277.77

-

416.67

-

Coriandrum sativum Linn.

593

-

-

-

-

-

-

600

-

611.11

416.67

-

Cucurbita maxima Duch. ex Lam.

-

-

-

-

-

263.88

-

600

-

611.11

416.67

285.71

Cucumis sativus Linn.

-

-

278

-

422.22

-

1555.56

-

277.77

-

833.33

285.71

Curcuma longa Linn.

-

352

-

592.59

422.22

263.88

1555.56

-

277.77

-

-

-

Glycine max (L.) Merr.

1185

-

592.59

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.

-

352

556

-

-

263.88

-

-

-

611.11

416.67

-

Luffa acutangula (Linn.) roxb.

593

352

-

-

422.22

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Momordica charantia Linn.

-

-

-

-

422.22

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Pisum sativum Linn.

-

-

-

1185.59

-

-

-

-

611.11

-

-

Solanum tuberosum Linn.

-

-

-

422.22

-

-

-

277.77

-

-

-

Spinacea oleracea Linn.

593

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Trigonella foenumgraecum Linn.

593

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

416.67

-

Zingiber officinale Roscoe

-

-

-

422.22

527.77

-

-

-

-

-

-

Vicia faba L.

-

-

-

1555.56

277.77

-

-

-

Wild herb species

Achyranthes aspera Linn.

-

-

-

-

422.22

263.88

-

-

-

-

-

-

Ageratum conyzoides Linn.

-

-

-

1185.18

844.44

791.66

-

1800

-

-

-

-

Arabidopsis stricta (Cambess.) Busch.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

285.71

Arthraxon hispidus (Thunb.) Makino

-

1056

556

-

844.44

527.77

-

-

-

-

-

Commelina benghalensis L.

593

-

556

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.

3556

2815

1944

592.59

-

-

-

-

277.77

-

-

285.71

Cyperus rotundus L.

593

704

-

-

-

-

-

-

555.55

-

-

Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.

-

-

-

-

-

-

1555.56

600

277.77

-

416.67

-

Equisetum debile Roxb. ex Vaucher

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

600

-

-

-

Euphorbia hirta L.

-

-

-

-

-

263.88

-

-

-

-

-

-

Galinsoga parviflora Cav.

593

352

278

1185.18

1266.67

1055.5

3111.11

2400

1111.1

-

-

285.71

Oxalis corniculata Linn.

2370

1056

1111

2962.96

2111.11

1055.5

6222.22

2400

-

611.11

1250

1142.8

Poa annua Linn.

-

-

-

-

-

26388

-

600

-

Polygonum nepalensis Meissn

-

-

-

-

422.22

527.77

-

1200

833.33

611.11

416.67

571.43

Stellaria media L.

-

352

278

1185.18

844.44

791.66

4666.67

1200

833.33

1222.22

2083.3

1428.5

Trifolium pretense L.

-

352

-

592.59

-

-

1200

277.77

-

-

-

Veronica anagallis aquatica Linn.

-

-

-

592.59

-

263.88

1555.56

600

277.77

-

-

-

Viola serpens Wall. Ex. Roxb.,

-

-

-

-

-

-

3111.11

-

277.77

-

-

-

Fruit tree species

Achras sapota L.

-

352

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Carica papaya Linn.

593

278

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Citrus limon (Linn.) Burm.f.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

600

277.78

-

-

-

Citrus sinensis Linn.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

277.77

-

-

-

Diospyros kaki Linn.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1200

-

-

-

Litchi chinensis Sonn.

593

704

278

592.59

-

263.88

-

-

-

-

-

-

Malus domestica Borkh.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

285.71

Mangifera indica L.

1778

1056

556

592.59

844.44

263.88

3111.11

600

277.77

-

-

-

Prunus persica Linn.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

600

-

-

416.67

285.71

Prunus armeniaca L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

416.67

285.71

Prunus domestica Linn.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

600

-

611.11

-

285.71

Psidium guajava Linn.

-

-

556

-

422.22

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Syzygium cumini (L.) Skeels

-

-

278

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Fodder tree species

Ficus auriculata Lour.

-

352

-

-

-

-

-

-

277.77

-

-

-

Grewia optiva J. R. Drumm. ex Burrett

-

-

-

-

-

-

1200

277.77

-

-

-

[i] (SHGs,MHGs, LHGs=small, medium, large homegardens, VLA, LA, MA, HA= very low, low,mid altitude, high altitude)

Table 3

Relative prevalence of homegardenspecies in different altitudes.

Plant species

VLA

LA

MA

HA

Mean

Cultivated

herb species

A. cepa

1222

1081

2341

876

1380

A. aspera

-

343

-

-

86

A. blitum var. oleracea

278

593

600

-

368

A. conyzoides

-

940

1800

-

685

A. esculentus

1025

528

439

-

498

A. hispidus

806

686

-

-

373

A. sativum

815

719

1011

1079

906

A. stracyes

-

-

-

286

71

A. stricta

-

-

-

286

71

B. juncea

-

-

-

600

150

B. oleracea var. botrytis

-

-

600

-

150

B. oleracea var. capitata

-

-

439

571

253

C. annuum

630

422

1972

1079

1026

C. esculenta

315

475

917

417

531

C. longa

352

426

917

-

424

C. maxima

-

264

600

438

325

C. sativum

593

-

600

514

427

C. sativus

278

422

917

560

544

G. max

1185

593

-

-

444

L. acutangula

473

422

-

-

224

L. siceraria

454

264

-

514

308

M. charantia

-

422

-

-

106

P. sativum

-

1186

-

611

449

S. oleracea

593

-

-

-

148

S. tuberosum

-

422

278

-

175

T. foenumgraecum

593

-

-

417

252

V. faba

-

-

917

-

229

Z. officinale

-

475

-

-

119

Wild herb species

C. benghalensis

575

-

-

-

144

C. dactylon

2772

593

278

286

982

C. rotundus

649

-

556

-

602

E. debile

-

-

600

-

150

E. hirta

-

264

-

-

66

E. indica

-

-

811

417

307

G. parviflora

408

1169

2207

286

1017

O. corniculata

1512

2043

4311

1001

2217

P. annua

-

264

600

-

216

P. nepalensis

-

475

1017

533

506

S. media

315

940

2233

1578

1267

T. pratense

352

593

739

-

421

V. anagallis-aquatic

-

428

811

-

310

V. serpens

-

-

1694

-

424

Fruit tree species

A. sapota

352

-

-

-

88

C. papaya

436

-

-

-

109

C. limon

-

-

439

-

110

C. sinensis

-

-

278

-

69

D. kaki

-

-

1200

-

300

L. chinensis

525

428

-

-

238

M. domestica

-

-

-

286

71

M. indica

1130

567

1330

-

757

P. persica

-

-

600

351

238

P. armeniaca

-

-

351

117

P. domestica

-

-

600

351

238

P. guajava

556

422

-

-

245

S. cumini

278

-

-

-

70

Fodder tree species

F. auriculata

352

-

278

-

157

G. optiva

-

-

739

-

185

[i] VLA=verylow altitude, LA=low altitude, MA=mid altitude, HA=high altitude

Plant utilization pattern

In the study area, homegarden species are used for primary and secondary needs of the family members and utilized as fruit, vegetable, medicine, timber, fuelwood, ornamental plant, sacred purposes and other miscellaneous purposes (Figure 5). Albuquerque et al. (2005)Albuquerque, Andrade, and Caballero (2005) reported the predominance of medicinal plants (26%) in homegardens of North-Eastern Brazil.Cui, Fu, Guo, and Chen (2000) also recorded that species of plants in traditional homegardens of China were utilized as: medicines (23%), vegetables (21%), fruits (19%), ornamentals (9%) and spices (7%). Dash & Misra (2001)Dash and Misra (2001) also observed that the vegetables and spices are the most edible cultivated plant in homegardens of Eastern Ghats of Orissa. WhereasSunwar, Thornstrom, Subedi, and Bystrom (2006) reported vegetable and species are the most important utilising products in Nepalese homegardens. (Blanckaerta, Swennenb, Floresa, Lopez, & Saadea, 2004) recorded 65.7 % ornamental, 29.6 % edible and 8.6 % medicinal plants in the homegardens of Mexico. These findings indicated that plant diversity was selected for cultivation in homegardens according to the requirements of the household. In our study, homegarden have a complex plant diversity from herbs to trees. The production of cultivated crops was consumed by family member and the local communities. The community also prefers the wild plants, fodder, wood and other miscellaneous uses from the homegarden system in small amount which is enough to them (Shukla, Kumari, & Chakravarty, 2017; Vibhuti, Shahi, Bargali, & Bargali, 2019).

Figure 5

Percent utilization of different use categories of homegarden species.

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/14edbd7a-b635-42b6-89eb-7c6127a8e178/image/6f190702-7893-4864-bc81-35c28c6931c8-ufigure-5.png

Relative Prevalence of homegardens species

Percentage of homegarden comprising with a particular species, represents relative prevalence of that particular species in area. Cluster of homegarden species across the altitudinal gradient on the basis of their relative prevalence is presented in Figure 6. Among the species, A. cepa (1380) and C. annuum (1026) showed most prevalence whereas S. cumini (278) was the least prevalent species. Across the altitudinal gradient, mid altitude showed most (2341, 1330) relative prevalence whereas high altitude showed least (876, 0) relative prevalence for A. cepa and M. indica, respectively Table 3. Uddin et al. (2002), reported red amaranth (RP=11690) and Indian spinach (RP=4606) as the most prevalent species in the homestead of Southeastern Bangladesh. The homegarden supply food especially for farmers in the rural areas because it could be maintained with low-cost input and diversified with high output.

Figure 6

Cluster of homegarden species across the altitudinal gradient on the basis of their relative prevalence.

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/14edbd7a-b635-42b6-89eb-7c6127a8e178/image/6cf39aec-571b-4dd3-be23-663c9723b821-ufigure-6.png

In this study, traditional homegardens of all villages possessed a multilayered vegetation structure. M. indica, L. chinensis, C. papaya and F. auriculata were the most frequent and dominant trees in very low and low altitudes, Citrus sp., D. kaki and G. optiva trees were most common in mid altitude whereas in high altitude, P. persica, P. armeniaca and M. domestica were most dominant trees. Herb Plants like A. cepa, A. sativum, C. sativum, C. maxima, L. siceraria, A. esculentus and C. esculenta were cultivated as vegetable plants in majority of homegardens at all the altitudes. Medicinal plants have a various therapeutic properties were abundant in all household homegardens. Most wild species like O. corniculata, S. media, C. dactylon, A. conyzoides and G. parviflora were used as fodder in different altitudes. The presence of fodder trees and grasses has a crucial value, which resulted in increase in the number of livestock and decrease in the livestock forage cost and women drudgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, home gardens are highly diverse with their utilization pattern in various ways. The socio-economic condition, management practice and the climatic factors were major determinant for farmer to enhance species diversity in homegarden systems. This study suggested that large sized homegardens are more efficient and more diversified than the small and medium sized homegardens at all the altitudes except mid altitude. Amaryllidaceae was the most important family in all the altitudes. High efficiency of utilized homegarden species was shared by medicinal plants and vegetables. Among the species, A. cepa and C. annuum showed most prevalence whereas S. cumini was the least prevalent species. Our study suggested that this traditional system should be recognized as potential unit to improve species composition, conserving plant genetic diversity and requires support to contribute food security in relation to altitude and homegarden size. Since homegardens are multipurpose systems provide important nutritional and health benefits, therefore, should be encouraged and can be improved by proper management practices, cooperative and extension services.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author contributions

V- Collected the data and prepared the manuscript, KB - Helped in analysis of data and manuscript preparation, SSB- Helped in conceptualization, study design and reviewed the manuscript.