Artificial Intelligence Driven Intelligent Computing: Integrating Cybersecurity, IoT, Cloud Computing, Financial Analytics, and Credit Risk Assessment for Digital Transformation

Main Article Content

Tariq Saeed Mian, Abdelrahman Elsharif Karrar, Rashiq Rafiq Marie, Muhammad Farrukh, Omar Almomani, Syed Adil Abbas Rizvi

Abstract

Background: Digital transformation couples cybersecurity, Internet of Things (IoT) and cloud infrastructure with data-driven financial decision-making, yet artificial intelligence (AI) in these domains is usually evaluated in isolation and under optimistic conditions.
Objective: To test, under one statistically controlled protocol, where AI adds measurable value across security, cloud–edge computing, credit risk and financial analytics.
Methods: We propose a four-layer Intelligent Computing for Digital Transformation (ICDT) framework and instantiate it on five public data sources. Eight intrusion detectors were trained on NSL-KDD and tested on its official shifted split; federated learning (FedAvg, FedProx) was simulated across ten IID or label-skewed clients; seven credit models were compared on two datasets with 30-fold repeated cross-validation; and machine-learning (ML) forecasts of the VIX and S&P 500 value-at-risk were benchmarked against HAR and GARCH-t models. Inference used bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs), McNemar, corrected resampled t, Friedman, Diebold–Mariano and Kupiec/Christoffersen tests, with calibration, SHAP explanations and age-group fairness.
Results: Intrusion detectors scoring F1 of 0.97–0.999 in cross-validation fell to 0.74–0.83 on the shifted test; novel attacks were detected 38 percentage points (pp) less often than known ones; tree ensembles kept the best ranking (XGBoost AUC 0.964) but a multilayer perceptron gave the best F1 (0.834, 95% CI [0.829, 0.839]). Federated training came within 3.5 pp of centralised F1 under label skew and far exceeded isolated clients. Stacking improved credit AUC over logistic regression by only 0.017 (95% CI [0.005, 0.028]) and 0.018 ([0.009, 0.027]), without reducing expected misclassification cost, and was the worst-calibrated model on one dataset; all models approved creditworthy young applicants 7–14 pp less often. HAR beat random forest and LightGBM for VIX forecasting (Diebold–Mariano p < 0.001), and only GARCH-t passed all 5% VaR backtests.
Conclusions: The benefit of AI complexity is domain-dependent: large for stationary high-dimensional classification, small for credit scoring, and absent for persistent financial time series. A shared assurance layer for shift-aware validation, calibration, explainability and fairness is essential for trustworthy digital transformation

Article Details

Section
Articles